<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IraqiTek &#187; Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://v2.iraqitek.com/tag/windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://v2.iraqitek.com</link>
	<description>Let's Bring Iraq Back</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 to include &#8220;XP mode&#8221; virtualization</title>
		<link>http://v2.iraqitek.com/2009/04/25/windows-7-to-include-xp-mode-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://v2.iraqitek.com/2009/04/25/windows-7-to-include-xp-mode-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Data-Base</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aplications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.iraqitek.com/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news that Windows 7 &#8212; release candidate on track for April 30, thank you very much &#8212; will have available a virtualized version of XP that will run right right alongside 7 apps is exciting stuff for those of us who have shaken our heads at Microsoft&#8217;s backward-compatibility problems over the years. It means [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news that Windows 7 &#8212; release candidate on track for April 30, thank you very much &#8212; will have available a virtualized version of XP that will run right right alongside 7 apps is exciting stuff for those of us who have shaken our heads at Microsoft&#8217;s backward-compatibility problems over the years. It means very nearly 100% compatibility with current Windows apps; it means side-by-side XP and 7 apps (dogs and cats living together!); it means that Vista was all just a bad dream. (Okay, maybe not.)</p>
<p><span id="more-913"></span>News of &#8220;Windows XP Mode&#8221; hit on Friday afternoon more or less simultaneously with Microsoft&#8217;s post on The Windows Blog announcing that the RC is looking good for next Thursday. Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott, who are hard at work on Wiley&#8217;s Windows 7 Secrets book and were briefed on the tech back in March, describe XPM as host-based virtualization, and suggest that this might mean that going forward, client versions of Windows may include a Hyper-V-based hypervisor.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not exactly included in 7, though. XPM (which will consist of that virtual environment and a fully licensed copy of XP with Service Pack 3) will be downloadable for those Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise and Ultimate Editions users who want it. But once it&#8217;s installed, it&#8217;s notably well-integrated &#8212; install an app inside the XP environment and without further ado it&#8217;s published to Windows 7 as well. That&#8217;s right, XP and Win7 apps running on a single desktop. (This ought to sound familiar to Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization users, but you Virtual PC users have some joy to look forward to. It may also ring a bell with users of Parallels on the Mac.)</p>
<p>Release of XPM is expected to be simultaneous with Windows 7&#8242;s release later this year.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.betanews.com/" target="_blank">www.betanews.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://v2.iraqitek.com/2009/04/25/windows-7-to-include-xp-mode-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
